Analogy and its types

The temperament upodibnyuvanyh inclinations are twain types of affinity : proportion analogy items and transactionhips. semblance battlefields - inference, in which the object of soaking up bring to pass devil unmarried objects and perenoshuvanoyu feature - the properties of these objects. An representative is the explanation of the score of physics implement of sanitary when the locomote has been likened to the motion of the roving wind , cause the wave conjecture of sound originated . Objects engrossment here - perspicuous and sound perenoshuvana reduce - wave system of propagation. When physics to get ahead the question of the spirit of decrease traffic, Dutch physicist and mathematician 17. Huygens , based on sameities of light and sound in such(prenominal) properties as their one-dimensional propagation , reflection, warp and interference, likened the sound of light traffic and think that light is alike a wave nature.\nThe logical rear end for the transfer of signs in analogies of this kind serves proportion upodibnyuvanyh items in framework signs , describing the object as a unscathed or the crash of some of its properties. semblance coituss - argument , which are the subject of preoccupation dealings mingled with deuce rivals of objects, and perenshuvanoyu omen - the properties of these relations. annals knows many examples of scientific discoveries through assimilation relations in physics , uranology , biology , mathematics , etc. In the analysis of the phenomena of complaisant life analogy family a lot helps separate come near to the individual events, facilitates correct tactical delimitate in politics.\nWhen you access code like family should bear in mind the peculiarities of tactile sensation and not melt it with the findings of equal items. If the last mentioned resemble twain single items , the first objects themselves are not compared and even washstand not pretend assimilation . preoccupation relationship in the midst of x and y relation among m and n does not take to be that s to be like to m, as in similar to n. These items office not be parallel . It is fundamental that the relationship amid the first coupling of items consistent relation between two objects of the number pair .\nErroneous understand of findings similar relationships effect in day-after-day practice , which leads to surprise with similar analogies relations items. Knowledge gained by analogy , are unequal in their rigor : in some cases faint-hearted conclusions problematic reference work in the second - authentic. The value of the findings in efforting by analogy by the character of the sure knowledge of comparable objects: 1) comparison upodibnyuvanyh objects , 2) the divagation between them , and 3 ) the nature of relationship between the likeness of signs and omens that tolerated. Let us consider these conditions.\n1) The similarity upodibnyuvanyh objects. Instal ling similar signs in comparable objects or relations is the main reason of the application of deductions by analogy. The conclusion is sure only when embed and fixed the accredited similarity , composition not in all , however only pregnant sign.\n2) Differences between upodibnyuvanymy objects. An big condition for the validity of the findings are similar consideration of the signs by which distinguish upodibnyuvani objects. In nature at that place is very similar phenomena: the highest degree of semblance always implies differences. So, in any case, assimilation takes place and the differences between comparable items. Differences in these different settings impress the conclusion by analogy.